Should Seattle have kept Bobby Wagner?

Depends on what you care about most with your football team. If your feelings are what's most important then, yeah, Seattle should have. But if it's winning? Seattle held on a year too long.

This isn’t quite the storyline we expected when Bobby Wagner signed with the Los Angeles Rams back in March.

The Seahawks looked like a team that was about to bottom out. They had already agreed to trade Russell Wilson to Denver and had released Wagner, who like Richard Sherman before him, decided to stay within the division. Wagner signed with the defending Super Bowl champions, adding to the constellation of stars that Los Angeles assembled.

Except the Rams are currently last in the division at 3-8, neither Matthew Stafford nor Aaron Donald is expected to play this Sunday and it’s Seattle that is harboring the playoff ambitions.

Should Wagner have spent his entire career in Seattle?